CABG vs PCI

🧠 CABG Indications:

Left main coronary artery disease

50% stenosis of left main = automatic CABG

Triple-vessel disease

70% stenosis in all three major vessels (RCA, LAD, LCx)
Especially with ↓ EF or diabetes

2-vessel disease involving proximal LAD + ↓ EF or diabetes

Failed PCI or restenosis after PCI

High SYNTAX score

Used in cardiology to assess lesion complexity (not tested heavily, but FYI)

🧠 PCI (Stenting) is preferred when:

✅ Single- or dual-vessel disease not involving left main
✅ Low SYNTAX score
✅ STEMI/NSTEMI with culprit lesion
✅ Unable to tolerate surgery (frail, comorbidities)

💡 USMLE Pro Tips:

  • CABG is not used in acute STEMI unless anatomy requires it or PCI fails

  • In patients with diabetes + multivessel disease, CABG improves long-term mortality more than PCI

  • If you see "proximal LAD" or "left main" = think CABG

🫀 Cardio Question:

A 62-year-old man with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia presents with exertional chest pain for the past 3 months. He reports the pain occurs after climbing one flight of stairs and resolves with rest. A stress echocardiogram shows reversible ischemia in the anterior and lateral walls. Cardiac catheterization shows:

  • 80% stenosis of the proximal LAD

  • 75% stenosis of the LCx

  • 70% stenosis of the RCA

What is the best next step in management?

A) PCI with drug-eluting stents
B) CABG
C) Medical therapy alone
D) Repeat stress testing in 6 months
E) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)

Answer: B) CABG

🔍 Why?

This is a classic vignette for CABG over PCI:

Triple-vessel disease
✅ Involves proximal LAD
✅ Patient has diabetes — big NBME keyword
✅ Reversible ischemia on stress testing

🔑 All of these stack the deck toward CABG, which improves long-term survival in diabetics with multivessel coronary disease far more than PCI.

🚫 Why not the other choices?

  • A) PCI – not preferred in triple-vessel disease + diabetes

  • C) Medical therapy – ischemia is too severe

  • D) Repeat stress – not needed; cath already confirms diagnosis

  • E) ICD – no indication; EF not mentioned, no arrhythmias or VT/VF

Manpreet Bindra

MedRise is a leading educational service focused on empowering medical students, IMG, FMG, residents, and healthcare professionals to succeed. We offer personalized learning solutions, remediation, and career consulting to help individuals achieve their academic and professional goals for the residency match. Our unique approach integrates technology and experience with medical education to create tailored learning experiences, whether you need help preparing for exams, residency applications, or hospital flow processes in GME.

Contact us for more info on how we can assist you in reaching your goals in the medical field including residency interview coaching, ERAS application, residency application assistance, US clinical experience, etc.

https://med-rise.com
Previous
Previous

🫀 Cardio Question: Empiric Antibiotics in Prosthetic Valve IE